
Once again, I’m learning from my colleagues, as yesterday I realized how important self-direction is in enabling social learning. Now I’m picking up on Jay’s post on Social Learning Gets Real and see how it connects to Jane’s observations. Jay has described several aspects of the future of social learning (below) and they map to the matrix (farther down) I created based on Jane’s five types of social learning.
As Jay says:
In the past, we’ve focused on individuals but work is performed by groups. Hence, I expect us to start helping groups learn to perform instead of individuals.
Why is this important? We have structures and systems in place that promote and validate individual training but we leave almost all of the social learning to chance.
For example:
Would it be better to 1) take a generic classroom workshop on information management or 2) spend a few hours serendipitously learning on Twitter.
Is it more effective to a) read prepared case studies or to b) co-create your group’s case study that can be shared with the entire organization?
Jane Hart’s social learning definitions:
I’ve written before how I use the chasm model to explain my professional work of 1) seeing what is ready to cross the chasm by 2) staying connected to the innovators & being an early adopter so that 3) I can help mainstream organizations. It’s a graphic summary of my consulting practice. As you can see, I ignore the Laggards.

In the field of web social media for workplace performance, what technologies are the Innovators experimenting with?
Which ones are now being picked up by the Early Adopters (like me) and finally, which technologies and ideas are ready to cross the chasm to the Early Majority?
| Innovators | Early Adopters | Crossing the Chasm | |
| Technology | Simulations | Micro-blogs | Blogs |
| Role-playing | Social Networks | Wikis | |
| Waves | Mobile | Social Bookmarks | |
| Ideas | Emergent Learning | PKM – PLN – PLE | Performance Support |
| Subject Matter Networks | Complexity | Informal Learning | |
| Group-centric Learning | Flow | Online Collaboration |
Any other ideas, additions or comments?
A coffee machine is a good starting point to create conversations :)
The tool must come at the end of your thinking process. You must first ask yourself the following questions: What kinds of social interactions are people looking to have in your learning environment?
What kinds of social interactions are you looking to facilitate?
How and from where do those interactions start?
Where do the conversations go?
What do people do with the outcomes of those conversations?
Overall, Elgg seems to be a good solution